For a former CEC, SY Quraishi doth protest too much against the Election Commission. What's his agenda?
With every passing week, former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Shahabuddin Yaqoob Quraishi is becoming shriller. Especially after many opposition political parties decided to call for the resignation of current CEC Gyanesh Kumar and Quraishi himself became the go-to guy for unbridled criticism of Kumar. If nothing else, this shrillness may well help sell his latest book, India and I: A Hundred Memories, Not a Memoir, launched in July. Nothing like regular TV appearances to sell your book.
In recent
interviews to foreign media, he has made over-the-top allegations against CEC Gyanesh
Kumar, and called the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls a “scam”.
Among the negative comments he made against Gyanesh Kumar to London-based Pervaiz
Alam, a former BBC journalist (why is one not surprised?), Alam put these claims
made by Quraishi on social media site X:
“He (Gyanesh Kumar) was not even found fit for the Additional Secretary panel.
Later he was also found unfit for the Secretary panel.” Quraishi stated that
Gyanesh Kumar’s only claims to fame were that he was close to Home Minister
Amit Shah, and a key player in the run-up to the abolition of article 370, which
gave Jammu & Kashmir its special status, and the setting up of the Ayodhya Ram
Mandir after the 2019 Supreme Court verdict.
If Kumar
played such a critical role in the abolition of article 370, which was later
upheld by the Supreme Court, and also the Ram Mandir, the country owes him a
huge vote of thanks, not Quraishi’s denigration. An X handle dug into
Quraishi’s past tweets on Gyanesh Kumar when he was appointed, where he
apparently welcomed
his appointment. I could not locate this tweet myself, but unless Quraishi
rebuts it, one has to presume he did welcome Gyanesh Kumar’s appointment in
2024. At that time, we definitely know that Quraishi did not talk about Gyanesh
Kumar as Amit Shah’s flunkey.
Neither the
CEC nor the SIR process can be beyond criticism. One can certainly say that SIR
could have been implemented better with lesser harassment of genuine voters.
The question is whether it is right for a former CEC to use such harsh language
against a constitutional authority and its head. He calls the SIR illegal and
unconstitutional, when it has been conducted eight times in the past, and the
Supreme Court, when it was approached, did not find anything wrong in it.
Quraishi finds
fault now with Gyanesh Kumar’s appointment through a three-member selection
committee in which the PM and Amit Shah were members. Granted, the government
side carried the day, as the leader of the opposition was outnumbered 2:1. But
wasn’t Quraishi himself appointed to the Election Commission without any
consultations outside the Congress party in 2010? He succeeded the
controversial Navin Chawla. Sonia Gandhi would surely have vetted his appointment
to the Commission before the government announced it. Nobody will believe that
Manmohan Singh appointed him all on his own.
In his book,
Quraishi mentions an incident where he was attacked by Congress ministers after
he had censured then Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid for violating the model
code of conduct during the UP elections of 2012. After this, he sent a sharp
message to Manmohan Singh through his media advisor in the Prime Minister’s Office
(PMO) Harish Khare. Quraishi threatened to go public if this did not stop. At a
meeting with Quraishi later, the Prime Minister apparently expressed deep concern,
calling the Election Commission the “soul of democracy” and if Quraishi
believed that he was behind these attacks, he would step down on “commit
suicide”.
We have only
Quraishi’s version of events, but assuming this is entirely true, the point is these
attacks could not have come at the Prime Minister’s promptings, for real power
during UPA was with Sonia Gandhi. If the ministers who criticised the CEC had
been encouraged to target him, it would have come from the party side, not the
PMO.
In his
missive to Harish Khare before meeting up with Manmohan Singh, Quraishi is
supposed to have said that “loose talk”
against the Election Commission was not right.
But isn’t he
doing the same right now, indulging in “loose talk” against the CEC and the
Election Commission?
Quraishi
seems to be driven by an agenda against both the Modi government and the CEC.
It is a pity that the media seems to consider only Quraishi to be an authentic
critic of the Election Commission when there are at least a dozen former CECs
still alive and kicking.
Comments
Post a Comment